APIs About Classic View

Transaction

bf328ebd8c47b809106877af8554e007f1a022abafda2b526aacf9f06c25e2c4

0000000000000000015f7b93062e0c06a18d32ab16f13bac4e545cffb0289871

Fee Paid

0.00000419 BSV(0.00878688 BSV - 0.00878269 BSV)

Fee Rate

1.016 sat/B

Confirmations

287,025

Timestamp (utc)

2018-11-03 18:51:48

Version

1

412 B

1 Input

Total Input: 0.00878688 BSV

#0
1J9qAG1ef8eZz6R2De14KkEUWEcQmjC49p
via 1a2c0d4a87876ee65baa41ad03062ddf23e748469a25e6c74b65e4e8fd53c22d [0]
0.00878688 BSV

2 Outputs

Total Output: 0.00878269 BSV

#0
1J9qAG1ef8eZz6R2De14KkEUWEcQmjC49p
spent 47dd3942d9e44330be601c530633768a8969b0660c88e452cca9d492aede1800 [0]
0.00878269 BSV
#1
memo.cash - Post topic message
0 BSV
jmBitcoin CashLÀ@jdh7190 as long as total hash of Coingeek, BMG and SVPool is not increasing substantially i see no reason to be impressed by SVPool hash. Most likely Coingeek is moving some of its hash to SV
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/bf328ebd8c47b809106877af8554e007f1a022abafda2b526aacf9f06c25e2c4
jmBitcoin CashLÀ@jdh7190 as long as total hash of Coingeek, BMG and SVPool is not increasing substantially i see no reason to be impressed by SVPool hash. Most likely Coingeek is moving some of its hash to SV