Transaction

266e6ebc00443a85eb429d0b47ecea00f027d463bb867ff7e7b784f6dc9f7180
( - )
6,380
2024-03-27 08:25:16
1
1,163 B

2 Outputs

Total Output:
  • j"1LAnZuoQdcKCkpDBKQMCgziGMoPC4VQUckM<div class="post"><div class="quoteheader"><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645.msg6757#msg6757">Quote from: Olipro on July 31, 2010, 12:56:50 AM</a></div><div class="quote">kind of, the point of this system is that you can leverage the network for escrow transactions so long as everything goes to plan, thereby ensuring a low cost. in instances of dispute, you will pay a third party.<br/></div>I'd go too with websites offering escrow services. The network is quiet complex as it is, without having to add all the confirmation, delay and dispute stuff.<br/>Currently when a transaction is broadcast it'll sooner or later be added to the block chain, what you are asking for is a mechanism to tentatively add a transaction and then dispute it later.<br/>Also who do you think will be the third party moderating the dispute? There is no real advantage in adding it to the protocol itself.</div> text/html
    https://whatsonchain.com/tx/266e6ebc00443a85eb429d0b47ecea00f027d463bb867ff7e7b784f6dc9f7180